LKY dismisses low press-freedom ranking for Singapore

Lee Kuan Yew dismisses low press-freedom ranking for Singapore

Singaporeans are free to read whatever they want, the influential founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew said of his country, which ranks near the bottom on a watchdog's index of press freedom.


Lee was referring to the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) annual ranking for 2006, which placed the city-state at 146 out of 168 nations, and lower than Zimbabwe at 140.
RSF cited "new legal action by the government against foreign media" for Singapore's slipping six places in the rankings.


"There's nothing that you'd want to read which you cannot read in Singapore," said Lee, who holds the influential title of minister mentor in the cabinet of his son.


"You can buy our newspapers and see whether we read like Zimbabwe..." he said Sunday night in a keynote address to the International Bar Association annual conference, which has attracted thousands of lawyers and jurists from around the world.


Lee said Singaporeans have wide access to information. "Everybody's on the Internet. Everybody's got broadband. They've got cable television, access to all the information. You can blog. You can do anything you like," he said in the speech which drew frequent applause.
"But we do not allow certain subjects to be made bones of contention."


Lee said issues of race, language and religion had to be handled sensitively. Singapore is majority ethnic Chinese but with significant Malay and Indian minorities. "A multi-racial, multi-religious society is always prone to conflicts," Lee said. The city-state has bitter memories of past racial incidents in its early years and clamps down hard on anyone inciting communal tensions.


RSF has said Singapore's low ranking stems from "the complete absence" of independent print and broadcast media, the opposition's lack of access to those media, and other factors.


Last year Singapore banned distribution of the Hong Kong-based Far Eastern Economic Review magazine, saying it had failed to comply with media regulations.


Lee and his son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, are suing the magazine's editor and Hong Kong-based Review Publishing, its owners, alleging defamation in an article last year based on an interview with pro-democracy activist Chee Soon Juan.


"We are often accused of suing people for defamation," Lee told his audience. But he said Singapore was built on the rule of law and did not tolerate corruption, in contrast to the surrounding region where "money politics" was a way of life. This means defamation action may be taken against those who impute dishonesty to government officials, in order to clear any doubts, he said. "As a result, people in Singapore do not equate their political leaders with second-hand car salesmen," Lee said.





My independent thought:

Singaporeans DO have a wide access of information via the internet, media and the likes but there ARE areas whereby we have to tread carefully. I do remember a few years back that there was a print media - a newspaper named Project Eyeball. It was grounded after a few months it was launched. According to my friend, who freelanced there at that time, the contents of the paper were mostly of controversial issues. Even though the main reason for its demise was fierce competition from free newspapers (at that time) - namely TODAY and STREATS, I think there was more than meets the eye. I feel that most Singaporeans, as educated as they are, are still not ready to tackle controversial issues. We are somewhat still living in a hallucinated world of me, myself and I. Yes we do have wide access of information, but how many of us are ACTIVELY reading and taking the initiative to understand the world around us? Most Singaporeans are just too busy ... too too busy ...